Who, in our current society, is currently "violating" the NAP?

[Marko]

As I argued in another topic:

Perhaps, but the store owner can not de-construct roads, nor would this help the people who were forced to pay for them. But if you recieve a large amount of cash from the government it is possible for you to in some way return it to the people it was stolen from. You can donate the cash to a local cause, or even place an add saying you will give it to the first net tax payer that contacts you.

Signing up for welfare is actually heroic as it means you liberate funds from the state. But the fact that you liberated something does not make it yours, if it has previous owners which cash certainly does. The money should be returned to whom it was taken taken from (which in some cases is happening without there being a transfer of the sort I describe, since it had been taken from the now recipient). I would liken this to Russian oligarchs who wrestled control of state companies for themselves. This was not an immoral act at all, but it should have been followed by them offering the real owners (the workers) to take over the title afterwards. So their continuing to hold on to something they liberated from the state, but has real owners is immoral.

Signing up to be a teacher in higher education and earn 60K per annum for very little work is not any low-level violation of the NAP. It is heroic, on par with a defense contractor swindling the state for millions of dollars for a weapon that doesn’t work, robbing Ft. Knox, or selling cocaine packages, but actually flour to the mafia. In each case you liberate wealth from control of thiefs.

The problem is hiding behind the state-granted title to hold onto it afterwards and even calling down the iron fist of the state to defend your control of money somebody else is entitled to to a higher degree than you and has come to reclaim it.