And it is not quite correct to state than in voluntary slavery you can quit it at anytime. It depends on the contract made between two or more consenting adults.
We’ve covered this before → here
Generally speaking, the only contract that matters is one in which property is entitled to someone else. Promises cannot be enforced (I promise I will go to bed before 10 pm is not an enforceable contract). Similarly, if I leave the slave quarters there is no property being destroyed.
If any contract whatsoever could be enforced, then you run into the problem of “voluntary rape,” where some time in the past you said that you’d be consenting in the future, but have since changed your mind.
However, this does not match up with Rothbard’s view of law; justice is not being served.
I doubt that. You would argue that whenever you have surgery you must have justice served to you and have the surgeon jailed for cutting you up?
When entering a mall, every single customber cannot fairly sign a contract upon entering which states how murder committed by that customer may be handled
Really? Isn’t that what you do with hotels? You sign a contract. I have thought of this before as well - it seems a bit… inhuman to sign a contract like that. But really, you only must sign the contract once with the mall. In fact, the mall might join some larger organization of business owners to make the task that much simpler on you. You will not have to sign a contract every time you enter a given store.
About your response to Wesker:
To arrive at a libertarian society, people will have to accept the NAP anyway (Clayton disagrees). Victimless crimes are the clearest violation of the NAP, so they will be the first to go. Even today in society victimless crimes are on their way out (at least pot).