Why Are Liberals Liberals?

Thanks for responding, Mr. Roemer. My responses to you are below.

You assert (again) that “free will” and “conscious knowledge”, now along with “mental being” and “human speech”, can’t be defined. Why not?

Thanks just the same for explaining that you consider “spirit” to be the same as “something that is undefinable”.

Is that the only possible way to find out whether animals have conscious knowledge or free will?

Thanks for the example, but I still don’t understand what you mean by “rational”. Can you please tell me?

Do you consider “believing in [something]” to be the same as “determining that [something] is true”? Why or why not?

Otherwise, can you please explain those three points in more detail?

How do we not know of it from our senses? Couldn’t we say that, whenever we see a person doing something, we’re observing free will?

Either way, if we don’t know of free will from our senses, how do we know of it?

As I mentioned before, “an infinite being” is in no way necessarily the same as “the God of the Bible”.

By “power”, do you mean “physical force” or “the ability to affect a person’s consciousness without his consent”? Either way, where does government’s power over people come from?