Just like you. You talk about an hypothetical and ridiculous system that can only exist if people prefer it. - But I don’t expect you to admit your double standard - it’d take too much intellectual honesty to do so.
What right ? Houses are privately owned. Access to them exists thanks to easements. The city ‘owner’ has no way to control who enters and leaves ‘his’ city. Get over it.
Whether they leave or not is irrelevant. Stop pretending that a free society is a bunch of flats for rent will you ?
Stranger ? Is he the same guy advocating bank socialism in this thread ? Oh boy. Is he the same guy that regards libertarian morality as a fairy tale ? … I suggest you try to pick better ‘allies’…
You’re a bit more clever at confusing things than he is, but are ultimately just as clueless. All your arguments reduce to equivocating ‘free society’ ‘city’ and ‘apartment building’.