With regards to the non-aggression principle? You are continuing the circular reasoning. And not all libertarians even believe in self-ownership.
Or how they understand them.
“Now a federated, decentralized system of free associations, incorporating economic as well as other social institutions, would be what I refer to as anarcho-syndicalism; and it seems to me that this is the appropriate form of social organization for an advanced technological society in which human beings do not have to be forced into the position of tools, of cogs in the machine. There is no longer any social necessity for human beings to be treated as mechanical elements in the productive process; that can be overcome and we must overcome it be a society of freedom and free association, in which the creative urge that I consider intrinsic to human nature will in fact be able to realize itself in whatever way it will.” - Noam Chomsky
Now what’s wrong with this?
its an implicit attack on anarcho-capitalism, and a particularly stupid one at that.
It reads a lot like Marx, “There is no longer any social necessity for human beings to be treated as mechanical elements in the productive process” Really? When did we surpass the need for division of labour?
How?
I’m not advocating the ideology, I’m just wondering why it is unallowable in the hypothetical voluntaryist world. He keeps saying “free association”, implying the existence of some sort of market.
Didn’t say you were, nor did I say it was unallowable, just stupid.
Isn’t it a workable ideology to ally with?
Too stupid for me.
Too stupid to utilize to achieve your desired goals?
Sounds like it, division of labour is pretty basic stuff.
Do you mean to say that you cannot properly define what would be coercion with general success because there is disagree on what coercion is?
Seems unnecessarily hard-headed.
your response seems unnecessarily soft-headed.
Sure, coercion is defined in terms of beliefs and meaning so its ultimately subjective.
Are we going down the rabbit hole again?
Not at all, such ideas do more harm than good. The less association the better.
Actually, we never got out.
Would you agree that initiated coercion in a circumstance isn’t descriptive of an economic event based on human action?
Maybe? Can you give some examples of non-economic events?