No. You are ruined because you have NO integrity. No-integrity=ruined. I can have everything stolen from me, raped, and near murdered and walk away focused on what is important in life which is enjoying a good meal with my family, etc… Will I have nightmares after that? undoubtedly, but they would not be what I would want. I would be asking why me, why me, because of what I DO want which is to be left alone in peace.
You don’t get it, do you? Whoever picks the judges and jurors gets to rig the game. That is why jurors should be picked at random (by lottery, or something).
What makes you think consumers would continue to subscribe to a rigged game?
i second that, if it hasn’t already been seconded. I know what is important in life and it’s not being around somebody that is soiled/corrupt.
Well, Job Wilderness, your integrity is noble. And I wouldn’t say that you should ever throw it away. What I’m saying is that anarcho-capitalism will never happen because the people who espouse it aren’t willing to play dirty. Your integrity becomes your undoing.
Ama Gi, How well would you appraise your own understanding of economics, in particular the Misesian notion of Consumer Sovereignty?
Should Jurors be picked at random for the same reason that owners of capital should be picked at random and that farmers should be picked at random?
All the more reason to remove human dictatorship and allow the invisible hand. Perhaps you should think about some of the things you stated.
The less power to people the better then.
Jurors would need to be paid by court costs, not some monthly or annual “subscription fee”. The costs should be split evenly between both sides. If somebody cannot afford to pay, they could set up a legal fund and have sympathetic individuals donate.
obviously, it’s not most here in this thread that is the problem. those advocating peace and justice. it is you bloom that is the problem. that’s not hard to figure out.
Of course I understand consumer sovereignty. He who pays the piper calls the tune. Which is exactly why I DON’T want everything to be judged by professional private arbiters.
The more jurors are on a case, and the more unpredictably they are assigned, the more difficult it is for money to influence the outcome.
Non sequitur after non sequitur.
Don’t you understand? Human dictatorship, to some degree, is unremovable. It has been around forever and will continue to be around until humans are gone from this planet. The question is: can we mold that dictatorship into something that can benefit the many or can’t we?
From the ashes of one government, the seeds of the next will be born. Unless you can take humans out of the game, there will always be governments. And they will always be corrupt at some level. I know none of the people on this forum will ever accept that. But this isn’t something you have to accept, it simply is.
But there are more of people like me. They usually just don’t think they’re like me.
There isn’t any anarcho-capitalist commandment saying you need have such a thing. The plaintiff and defendant could just as easily take the case to the barber down the street.
I was simply pointing out that the “we”, the all humans, are NOT the problem. You are one of the problems. It doesn’t matter if I’m the last one standing. Why would I want to live in a world that is totally corrupt with immoral people running around stark raving mad? Either way I hold dear what is good and savor the good feeling of love and peace til the last moment. I will know how it feels - to feel good. What else is there?
No I don’t understand. Neither did the slave abolitionists. Try posting something that makes sense and isn’t logically fallacious.
That’s not the point. You’ve made a couple of arguments that are horribly wrong. It’s up to you to understand that your arguments are flawed.
If you post nonsense here it won’t go unchallenged. Whether you change your mind or not is mostly irrelevant.
a general note : The business cycle is caused by counterfeiting done by the banking mafia. The banking mafia can operate without a central bank and has done that in the past. All they need is legal privileges (which they always have).
No. You lose in both fields.
Your mindset is problem.
but not everything would be judged by professional private arbiters. customers do some judging too don’t they? do I have to spell it out? or in light of consumer sovereignty do you may be know where this is headed already?
Negative. Most people are not like you. If that were true we’d have many more politicians!
Pretending to know what ‘most people are like’ is utter lunacy.