…but you can live with no real consistent philosophy for anything, essentially going along with whatever seems appealing to you at the time, basically believing that violating the rights of others is fine as long as it’s a case that you don’t really care about, or it concerns something you don’t like anyway, or especially, if you personally benefit from it.
You can live claiming to not really believe in right or wrong, and to not have morals/ not take moral positions/ don’t think about morals, etc. (despite arbitrarily making moral judgements when it suits you), and essentially being indifferent toward minimizing conflict.
You can live believing that quite literally people should do whatever they want without any real order maintained by established law based in fundamental principles which minimize conflict.
Got it.
P.S.
Libertarianism is not just about being morally right, and that is not all libertarians care about. This is a mischaracterization from someone who obviously has no real understanding of what he’s talking about.
For anyone interested, definitely check out The Ultimate Beginner Meta-thread libertarianism section.