Anybody here who has read extensively on Herbert Spencer?

What are your thoughts on him, especially since he has been tagged with the “Social Darwinist” label? From what I’ve read, he never justified laissez-faire through Social Darwinism, but simply compared human society with an organism, applying Darwinian elements of change to its evolution. I ask because I’m reading a book and the author(s) cannot shut up about Spencer-Social Darwinism-laissez faire. They even drag William Graham Sumner into it, who, unless I am mistaken, wrote little, if anything, about Social Darwinism? This all seems to be Richard Hofstadter’s fault.

Am I missing something?

Read this, this, and this. Hofstadter’s misunderstanding has ruined Spencer since the 40’s

Thanks a bunch!