But at least both would lower the unemployment rate, and thus end poverty, right?
Why don’t you just admit what you said was wrong? It’s okay to be wrong once in a while.
No, actually the point behind that was to show much of a complete dumbass you are.
So the point was not to answer the question then. As I thought.
Your questions were rhetorical. Come on, you’re not fooling anyone with this.
“This one actually made me chuckle.”
I betcha it’d be really f****** good too. We two people hate each other that much…and one of them is female…to be able to take all that anger out on each other, in a sexually physically way…that’s be one of the best lays of your life.
Why don’t you just admit what you said was wrong? It’s okay to be wrong once in a while.
Of course both would lower unemployment, and of course building homes would be a better way to do so. So what should I admit I was ‘wrong’ about exactly?
For whatever it’s worth, my respect for you is steadily decreasing with every post of this sort. I find your puerile attempts to change the subject to be worthy of nothing but contempt.
Your questions were rhetorical. Come on, you’re not fooling anyone with this.
No. They were not rhetorical questions. I want to know what alternative you suggest that guarantees a safety net.
I don’t believe you. And nothing is ever guaranteed - not even by the government.
For whatever it’s worth, my respect for you is steadily decreasing with every post of this sort. I find your puerile attempts to change the subject to be worthy of nothing but contempt.
Now this really did make me chuckle. Brilliant stuff.
nothing is ever guaranteed - not even by the government.
It’s certainly more secure with the government though.
Do you expect me to be embarrassed now? Because I’m not.
Go on and prove it. I dare you.
Do you expect me to be embarrassed now? Because I’m not.
Why would I expect you to be embarrassed?
I don’t know why else you would say that what I wrote really did make you chuckle. Regardless, my attitude remains completely unchanged.
Go on and prove it. I dare you.
The historical record is my only witness. And if you’re going where I think you are with this, you can tuck your ‘Praxeology’ back into it’s holster. It’s nonsese.
Care to source this historical record? Have you even read Welfare before the Welfare State?
Try again.
Make me.
Prove it.
Care to source this historical record? Have you even read Welfare before the Welfare State?
Will do so when I get back from the pub. Beer awaits me. Later all.
Running away so soon? Go cry me a river. This isn’t over.
Running away so soon? Go cry me a river. This isn’t over.
I love the way you actually edited that post to add in “Running away so soon?” Just to make it that itsy bit more obnoxious than it originally was.