Hi folks,
I have been consistently perplexed by the use of the term “capital.” I understand what a capital good is, but the word “capital” used alone seems to have a slightly different meaning. I thought that I finally had my answer when I read Robert P. Murphy’s definition of capital in “Study Guide to Human Action: a Treatise on Economics,” but the definition introduces more confusion than clarification.
"Economic calculation rests on the notions of capital and
income. The capital associated with a particular enterprise is the
estimated sum of money that could be raised if all of the assets
were sold and all the liabilities were discharged. Income is the
amount of consumption that a particular collection of goods can
yield without lowering the capital. If income exceeds consumption,
the difference is saving. If consumption exceeds income,
the difference is capital consumption (Study Guide, PDF p. 126)."
(I’m also having trouble adjusting the font.) So the actual definition of the term “capital” seems to be straightforward enough, as the estimated monetary sum which can be acquired when the assets of an enterprise are sold and its liabilities are met (“discharged”). Robert’s definition of income, though, throws me off. This logjam extends to Robert’s definition of savings, which depends on the definition of income and the term “consumption,” which also seems to have a meaning different to the one to which I am accustomed. At the end of the day, I’m more confused than when I went in to reading this paragraph. Can anyone clarify?
Thanks.
Egon