This is a large part of the problem. This exemplifies it quite well. This is so confused, it doesn’t even make sense. I went into this this post (please have a look), but I’ll reproduce some of it here because I think it’s important:
Capitalism is not some kind of system written down on paper. Capitalism is basically a word to describe a market process that occurs when individual rights are respected. This was not “designed” by anyone.
To say something like “capitalism doesn’t take human nature and greed into account” [or “people pursue personal profit; with or without capitalism”] just oozes ignorance. You might as well just say human nature doesn’t take human nature into account [or “people pursue personal profit, with or without pursuing their own self interest”]. Again, human beings have a general concept of private property and a wish to avoid conflict. They are also self-interested, and tend to do things because they gain satisfaction from doing them…more so than they would by not doing them. (Otherwise, they wouldn’t do them.)
Capitalism is not some “theory”…it is a description of what takes place when self-interested individuals come together and, while respecting individual rights (i.e. property rights…including your physical body), interact to fulfill their desires. To say that it has “forgotten” something, or “left something out” or hasn’t “taken something into account” is just asinine. It’s like saying “the concept of flying doesn’t take into account the laws of aerodynamics”. Flying is the laws of aerodynamics. Capitalism is human nature.
The only way anyone can say otherwise is if they have a faulty definition of the word.
I realize some of that is kind of what you were trying to say, but your wording is entirely self-defeating.