lol is that what that is. You mean you realized you didn’t know what you were talking about, and that your claims didn’t actually agree with the posititon you were taking so you finally realized you needed to shift away and stop spouting them and instead start spouting new things that contradict the things you were orginially saying.
I have to assume this is also why you have been so apprehensive to actually address anything I’ve actually said, out of fear you might say something else that disagrees with your position (that you are evidently so intellectually shaky on), so instead you just elect to use an easy analogy to explain DNS, and then assert that it debunks everything/ or even anything I or Stephan Kinsella has said.
And then anytime I specifically ask you to actually demonstrate or even just point out what specifically I or Kinsella have said that is incorrect, you just resort back to a simple “hey it’s all here in the thread man. Anyone can read it.”
It’s quite obvious it is you who has little understanding and/or a severely lacking grasp of the concepts being discussed here, so you’ve simply (and wisely) decided to stop putting your foot in your mouth and resorted simply playing the role of sidekick troll. (While projecting your own lack of understanding of the situation onto me, of course.)
I honestly wouldn’t even be surprised if you ran off to Clayton or your old lady lykos in private to get some much needed moral support for your bruised ego. “Hey Auto, have you been in the forum lately? JJ’s at it again. Have a look at this thread. Man is he wrong or what?!” “Hey Clayton, what do you think JJ’s problem is? Is he just crazy or dumb?”
[translation: “Please help me feel better. Tell me I’m right, or at least that my opponent is wrong and stupid. I need to hear it right now.”]
I hope they were able to give you the comfort you needed, Lucky, I really do.
Oh of course not.
How the hell was I supposed to know you all of a sudden became an Internet expert in page and a half of thread posts? You make it sound like I went and dug up some obscure pamphlet you authored 35 years ago and used it claim you were a neocon. This was probably less than half a dozen posts of yours ago. In fact you were still defending your ownship of roads crap on the very second post of this page (right before you wised up and started to say less and switched to responding with simple "lol"s). It’s not exactly unfathomable that you would un-realizingly contradict yourself. I mean, you did put forth some pretty ridiculous claims in the first place…is it so out of the question that someone who came up with that parade analogy would say something that conflicted with something else he said, without realizing it? Gotta play the odds here.
I could say virtually the exact same thing to you. You have done nothing to demonstrate what it is I have said that is wrong, you have done nothing to refute virtually anything I’ve said. All you’ve done is make assertions and then claim “the proof is in the thread, man. Anyone can read it.”
tl;dr:
Again, if you could actually demonstrate what is wrong about anything I’ve said, you would have happily done so already. But obviously you can’t, so you haven’t. But you can’t leave it at that either, and simply bow out once you recognized you didn’t know what you were talking about. That would be “letting the other guy win…get the best of you”. Can’t let that happen. Then the bully wins! Can’t show any weakness!" It may be wise to find a new friend. I think your current one is rubbing off on you.