Okay so I saw a philosophy website that bashes rothbard calling his ethics “contract fetishism”. He seems to be of the opinion that there is no such thing as absolute property rights and that they are somehow incapatible with self-ownership and consent.I saw it here: http://www.blazingtruth.com/contract-fetishism/. Now as a libertarian I don’t agree with this and his critique I actually find confusing to read because it seems like he is in support of the social contract bullshit I don’t even understand how that makes sense since it just seems like a jedi mind trick to me.
What I would like to know is how contracts would work in AnCap society and what absolute property rights are and how is consent defined? You don’t have to look at the link it just kind of pissed me off and at the end the douche bag takes the yellow and black flag and puts a pirate symbol on it.
Thanks for some directions. It sounded like some sort of convulted semantical problem anyway. But I thought I could get some directions on what to read after reading trash talk. Thanks again.
ok now I have a new question how would bankruptcy be handled in Title Transfer theory if someone would be unable to pay? I mean one option is pray for mercy from the creditor and another I see is private charity coming to the rescue. What kind of options does a debtor now have?
