So in-born would “a baby closing his eyes when a bright light flashes his eyes”, and a priori would be “a babies closes his eyes when a bright light flashes his eyes”?
no thats a posteriori
a priori would be 'a baby is a baby and also not not a baby. ’
So, a priori would be “a baby is a baby and also not not a baby” even though the baby doesn’t know or realize or recognize that he is " a baby and also not not a baby"?
yes
Unless the baby is the epistemic subject, it’s irrelevant.