I was discussing this with a guy. I will try to reconstruct it from memory as best as I can:
He: Demand creates growth
Me: Africa has more demand than any part of the world. Why aren’t they all rich?
He: Because the demand hasn’t been met.
Me: Met by what? Production. Because demand doesn’t create growth.
He: The demand has to come first.
Me: So Keynes (his hero, by the way) was wrong when he said that supply sometimes creates it’s own demand?
He: No, he was right. Of course, supply can create it’s own demand.
Me: Why? (interuppting him) Because demand doesn’t cause growth.
He: No, demand has to come first.
Me: So, there was a demand for Pet Rocks? For Rubik’s Cubes? No, there wasn’t. The production of these things came first.
He: There was a demand for toys.
(note: earlier I had said that demand was a constant. He said it isn’t constant: it’s dynamic. I said but it always exists.)
Me: Yes, as I said earlier, demand is a constant. There was no demand for Coca Cola. The inventor of Coca Cola really pushed his product hard, and didn’t do too well at first.
He: There is a demand for drinks.
Me: So, demand is a constant.
He: No, it’s not.
Me: So Keynes was wrong, demand never creates it’s own supply.
Then he and I started talking about cars, and how there is a glut of cars on the market, but no demand. He thought he won the exchange because I didn’t know how to (or have the energy to think of how to) counter him.
So, is he right? Brand new cars are sitting on the lot, waiting to be sold, but since demand is at record lows, they aren’t selling.
I am trying to suss it out, but I worked 16 hours per day, two days in a row helping my nephew move, and my brain isn’t working too well.