unless he was consistent on polylogism and implicitly admitted that he was wrong.[6]
Someone should make a t-shirt that says:
“Karl Marx’s sugar daddy was a capitalist.”
expect that marxists wouldn’t have a problem with that. they are not morally opposed to capitalism, social anarchists would though.
You are a marketing genius.
“Karl Marx was bourgeois. The proletariat fell into the trap.”
“Socialism is the opium of the masses.”
lol..
Or have a picture of Marx with
‘False Consciousness’ underneath.
or “matter before mind”.
that’s good.
I wonder what class of argumentation that might be considered. If it already has a name, because those kinds of arguments aren’t really arguments all seem to be based on ‘matter’. Whether it’s race, sex, history as a form of matter (the data/facts/material events people present about history without any theory is interpret the reasons for all of those facts fitting one way or another), evolution or gene explanations that don’t offer any theories or ideas, logical positivism, etc… The arguments void of arguments that base everything on a ‘thing’ or matter.
That’s a good point. Do you know if there is one name that fit’s them all into one category?
wasnt it shakespare who coined that phrase?
i simply switched the words around.