That has nothing to do with the word “wrong”. What is “wrong” is subjective.
To your first point- you should know by now that the political parties don’t really mean anything in terms of their ideology. The Democratic party isn’t really progressive. The Republican party isn’t that conservative. It’s more neo-conish. No, I must have missed you calling him a neocon.
As to your second point I take the position that WWII need not have happened if WWI had happened. WWI was an unjust war, and, just because I don’t like WWII doesn’t mean that I support dictators like Hitler or Stalin.
…The NAP [ a principle of non-aggression which states ‘keep your hands to yourself’ ] dictates right/wrong behavior.
You subjectively believe in the NAP, according to some people it is just a philosophical fallacy, so peddling it as “objective” is a moot point.
Lam, your grasp of philosophy is rather poor…You might subjectively believe otherwise of course…
You believe in is valid to initiate violence? Rationalize your position.
All “morailty” including the NAP is subjective.
Yes. And when socialism/government fails, people blame the market since the conservatives paid lip service to it. It’s a loose loose proposition.
Really? Explain how a legal system would work in which each individual has subjective morality.
Oh yes ? That’s what the dictionary says ? By the way, why do you object to my stating the fact that the american military are despicable murderers ?
That’s a reactionary response. People don’t really want to blame the government for the economic collapses so they just either say that the free-market is bad, or, that it’s good but it has its faults. They never look to where the federal reserve is and what it’s doing usually. It’s good that more and more people are waking up to what they’re doing and wanting to do something about it though.
And Lauging Man if you want to know how people would legislate subjective morality just ask any Republican. They’ll be able to tell you how they would do it. Poptech probably is a Republican I’m guessing so he would have some ideas on that.
that’s why you don’t know you support criminals cause you admit you don’t know the difference between what is right and what is wrong…lol
It cannot which is why anarcho-capitalism is an idealistic fantasy.
Positive liberty is a contradiction. It transgresses the most basic liberty principles.
Because they are not murders (actual definition).
good answer
That makes no sense…you said all morality is subjective…then you say anarcho-capitalism can’t work…
Who defines what is right and wrong? You? Me? Who is the authority to define this? I thought you do not believe in “authority”. What I stated is morality is subjective and it is, this is irrefutable.
and that’s why Poptech supports it. cause he don’t know[:P] what’s right or wrong. so it’s all what Poptech arbitrarily decides in his sophist world in which the blind lead the blind. No light of reason in Poptech’s worldview. no point in even bothering anymore. since he doesn’t even know what is right or wrong he’ll change the goal posts and arbitrarily say whatever he wants. in his worldview he can do anything and get away with it, including murder, rape, and stealing cause there isn’t any right or wrong. it’s a sadistic joke.
see ya Poptech. bye-bye
Who knows what is right and wrong? You? You are no better than the socialists who want to force their “ideals”. You just want your “laws”, your “morality”. It is all becoming very clear. You don’t even realize the weakness in your arguments because it is all based on your subjective morality.
How naive.