Is dialogue about what another person means becoming subjective now too and nobody is supposed to know what everybody else is talking about anymore and we are all to merely delve into not trying to understand each other?
Calm down.
ok
I prefer the truth to some rosy libertarian false ideology that seeks to cloak their ideology in falsehoods because they cannot accept what is true.
That doesn’t answer my question. If the government has no obligation to anyone then why do you expect government to respect anything that is yours [ if you do believe that government is unjust/immoral/bad whatever you wish to call it ]?
but that would only be a subjective statement - not a truth statement.
I’ve been following this thread from work on my iPhone all day, and the manner in which wilderness has conducted himself has been very disappointing.
wilderness,
LS simply expresses agreement with someone who disagrees with you, and you have the nerve and disrespect to call him “lost” thereby. Not cool.
I don’t need a group hug. You’re the one who’s been going overboard. In my opinion it was OT, so I made a polite (jovial, even) request.
I think he is lost. so what? Are you going or is he going to actually show otherwise?
Obviously - yet again - I think LS and you went overboard. I think you and I have actually come to some understanding in this thread, but all this sh-t throwing is getting annoying.
And you refused the hug - remember that! Are you that perturbed? I mean if you can’t even try, then maybe it’s not me.
Hey sonny, What’s your non-rosy, non-libertarian ‘ideology’ ? Apart from your childish skepticism, what else can you offer as far as political theory goes ?
i could guess at this, but i hope i’m wrong…
well if he can’t even show love, then does that mean he hates? Or has love become unfashionable and too objective now also?
And what is true?
Again, you are the one who’s been going overboard. His response was not emotional. It actually showed a lot of restraint, given that you called him “lost” over the most benign expression of agreement on his part.
The imperious tone will get you nowhere fast, wilderness.
You JUST started the discussion with him, and already you’re calling him (and me, again) a liar.
Lilburne,
I don’t know if you are intentionally using the words dishonestly. And I’m not addressing the rest of the post - it’s old news and stupid.
The first sentence is grossly unfair. The second is grossly hypocritical. You’re becoming unhinged.
Are you calling Liberty Student a worm?
You saved me the trouble from posting this, LM. [Y]