Feudal Land Arrangements Under Anarcho Capitalism.

[Juan]

@GilesStratton

@Juan

Characterizing argentina as 'religious' is a joke.

In fact, I’ve spoken to a very good (conservative) friend of mine from Argentina.

So all your information comes from one biased source. That shows the quality of your arguments.

I’ve asked this many times now: what incentives do people have to own land (you’ve provided none).

Really ? Let me refresh your memory :

[url]Should a free society allow for the viewing of child pornography? - #306 by Brainpolice]

@Juan

@GilesStratton

And yet you haven't met the objection that there is no incentive for people to own their own land.

Such objection exists only in your mind. Not paying rent and not being bound to terms set by a landlord sound like incentives to NOT rent…

---

@GilesStratton

Your point was that whilst land prices will go up, land rents would too. Which is correct…

Of course it is. You claimed that high land prices are an incentive for people to rent, but that is NONSENSE. Let’s follow your ‘logic’. Land would be expensive, so people won’t buy it. Rent would be expensive too…so people won’t rent either. Conclusion : the majority of people will be homeless.

…but time preference means that people would rather rent the land then buy it.

Again, that shows you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Yes, people would have a lower time preference,

So they would save and buy land instead of renting. So you either admit that your conservative society won’t have a low time preference, or you admit that a low time preference implies that the majority of people WON’T live as tenants. You CAN’T have it both ways.

But that still doesn’t mean people have any incentive to own their land,

Unfounded assertion.

I, on the other hand have managed to come up with incentives for feudal like land arrangements (perhaps you’ve ignored them?).

Those incentives exist only in your mind. I’ve ‘ignored’ them since they are just wishful thinking AND backed by your glaringly wrong ecnomics.

@GilesStratton

@Juan

Either Giles believes what he's saying (my assumption) or doesn't believe what he's saying (that's what LS seems to think). If Giles doesn't believe in so called cultural conservatism but defends the position 'for fun' then he is a troll of sorts ?

I do believe what I’m saying, and yet LS clearly grasps something that you don’t.

And what would that something be ?

@GilesStratton

@Juan

Besides, I see no reason for being polite towards somebody who addresses me as “leftist scum”.

You seem to be quite confused in regards to who was rude first Juan.

Did I call you scum ? Besides I thought you believed in “turning the other cheeck”…? Oh wait. Do as I say don’t do as I do…

@GilesStratton

@Juan

[Conservatives]have no problem with conservative states such as the catholic church. Furthermore, they claim that such states "built western civilization"...

Quite amusing, since, I’m not a catholic. Now, please do tell me where I said that they “built western civilzation”.

Well, I didn’t say you said that. The reference should be clear though, and if it’s not, try google.