Flamebaiting Anarcho-Capitalism and Failing

I wish I could help but I also find it illogical. Not to mention Ludwig von Mises did not support anarchy.

And I prefer living in the United States rather than Somalia.

In regards to debating with friends, you should never be afraid to do this and I recommend it so long as you can keep your emotions in check and not piss them off by calling them statists or the U.S. military murderers. Present your argument and try to support it. If you cannot convince them it would be due to your argument not being convincing, unsupported or flawed. Rethink your argument and try to find better evidence to support your position.

I am personally reading up more on the anarcho-capitalist position and am thoroughly unconvinced.

Poptech, not every mention of the word “anarchism” is a cue for you to squeeze in a cheap shot.

But poptech dear, the american military (like any other military) are murderers.

Get back on topic or rules of the forum will be enforced.

Rules of the LvMI

For anyone who needs reminding.

And I would prefer it if you didn’t troll. That’s a hint, by the way. You could be useful if you cleaned up your act.

To be honest, that’s not a valid argument. And I’m not even an anarchist.

your not an anarchist? o o lol

If, as you claim, you read the Independent Institute website, then you might want to reconsider this.

Such as?

Not claim, do but like various sites, reading everything is next to impossible, they cover many subjects.

Chaos Theory - Weak

OK…what makes it weak?

The whole “book” is filled with idealistic assumptions.

In an anarcho-capitalist society why would someone who does not have property bordering another state pay for military insurance?

Why would military insurance companies not charge more for property owners living next to bordering states?

Why would an insurance company waste money on military resources defending an insurer when it would be more cost effective to let the insurer get killed than try to repel the invading army? In essence collect premiums until an attack and then just leave, If the policyholder is dead you don’t have to pay anything out in claims. The insurance company has the military so who is going to stop them?

What happens if there is a computer problem (payment lost or disputed) with my electronic military insurance monthly payment, my property is under attack preventing me from bringing in income and I cannot make another monthly payment in full?

Why would there be “time” for bad defense insurance companies to fail and better ones to survive? If they fail and the anarchist state is taken over, you don’t get a second try.

What private army in history has defeated a state?

The whole theory is idealistic and naive.

If an insurance company were to do that, no individual would anymore trust them. I am sure that you are, at the least, intelligent enough to realize that if a business were to not have any clients, they would cease to be a relevant business.

Is it now.

Why have insurance at all? When you understand the answer to that question, you’ll have your own answer.

I don’t recall that he says they wouldn’t, and I own a copy of it.

Because it wouldn’t.

What happens if monkeys fly out of your ass?

Says who?

The Viet Cong certainly embarrassed the US. And the mujahadeen did to the Soviets.

Warning: thread hijacking in progress.

Good question. What’s your point?

So what if they do?

Fire insurance companies charge more the farther you are from a fire station, insurance companies charge more for life insurance if you’re a smoker. Are you also against that?

Bankruptcy might.

Look around you Poptech, how many insurance companies do you see in business who have, even one time, blatantly cheated large amounts of people out of business?

Uhhhhh…if you made the payment, and the insurance company lost it, why would you have to pay again?

Give me one example in the history of mankind where a comparatively tiny armed force has ruled over a mass of armed people, without any idealogical support whatsoever.

I’ll wait.

As opposed to the idea that we must entrust some of our most important industries (justice and protection) into the angelic hands of career politicians.

Yes, you’ve clearly got a strong hold on reality.

Indeed.

You see PopTech, this is why, if you have an ideological bone to pick, you start your own damn thread.

Now, by baiting people, your lame little cheap shot has driven this thread completely off-topic. Don’t do it again.

Should I not respond to Liberty Student’s questions? Like you I am here to obey all regulations.

Maybe you should respond to mine, sometime i.e the ones you’ve conveniently ignored. Or you could not, and simply stop trolling. Either is good.

Your original cheap shot at anarchism at the beginning of the thread, and which started this whole threadjack, wasn’t an appropriate response to any question put to you.

In the future I will ask your permission for what my opinion on a subject should be.