Does anyone have any links to narrative on the subject of which human rights should be forfeited by anyone committing crime?
Estoppel?
I just recall an article that tells you why to revoke your human rights in general. I don’t know, if that would be helpful for you. (I’d have to search.)
Thanks. Am reading up on Estoppel and Torsten, I’ll have more thorough look, thanks.
I didn’t find the article I had in ming, but something that comes close to the reasoning:
http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/04/12/48833166.html
However you think in terms of conditional human rights on a list. that a criminal forfeits. I don’t think in terms of human rights there is something like a forfeiture, due to a crime. It’s implied they can get suspended. The only exception being made would be:
I find that a rather interesting statement. It seems you get all your rights suddenly revoked, if you disagree with the United Nations.
In general. rights are forfeited to the extent of the crime.
Wibee,
What you say makes a certain amount of sense.
If you steal someone’s property, how can you lay claim to ownership of those stolen goods when you catch someone else trying to ‘steal’ those same stolen goods from you? And because you did not, for example, infringe on someone’s right to be free from torture, you can reasonably say without fear of contradiction that you expect not to be tortured.
It seems there is an element of consistency which places/should place an infringer outside of being protected by the law (where the right is protected by law).
This gets interesting. What is the appropriate punishment for a murder? Should a murderer forfeit his right to life?