Wheylous,
You are essentially arguing that evolution, presumably of the naturalistic type, solves the probelm but it doesn’t on two counts: if it is true then it only allows fallible determinsim, clearly not infallible for obvious reasons, which can provide no foundation for truth since we can never know whether we are determined to be correct or incorrect- we cannot step out of the system and independently verify the truth value of a particular proposition; secondly, evolution only produces survivors not philosophers which is essentially Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.
If you are interested in these arguments I have an extensive debate on the matter which can be found here.