As you may know, Freedomain Radio was featured in an article in the British newspaper The Guardian last weekend.
Now, as we all know, the mainstream media is often far from accurate when it comes to representing libertarian, free-market or voluntarist ideas. I think that this article is a very good example of how a source can take a reporter for a ride.
If you would like to read the article, and my response to it, you can click below, I think it is very interesting, please let me know what you think.[:)]
Just out of interest, isn’t this atheist posting of forums owned by a Catholic, the same guy who blasts libertarians for working on universities with privately owned seats? The same anti family man having a kid?
To be frank, the biggest problem that I have with FDR is that I think he represents some of the most atrocious statism that ever came from the office of the American presidency.
Oh, wait! You mean that other FDR!
Seriously, though. That is my joking attempt to indicate that the acronym is confusing and annoying because of that. I guess it is too late to change that.
As long as we’re shamelessly promoting, I may as well link to my critique of Stefan’s book, Universally Preferable Behaviour: A Rational Proof of Secular Ethics. Stefan, now that we’re no longer “at your dinner table,” I suppose this would be a reasonable time to offer to discuss my critique with you. That is, of course, if you’re interested; I’m sure that the Guardian article has put a lot on your plate.