GDP growth and penile length

Economics Economics Questions
1

It’s been established:

https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/27239/HECER-DP335.pdf?sequence=1

“Taken at face value the findings suggest that the ‘male organ hypothesis’ put forward here is quite penetrating an argument. Yet for the best of author’s knowledge, male organ has not been touched in the growth literature before.”

2

man, that kind of bullshit is why economics gets no respect.

Big Bong HIt.

Coughing.

“You think bigger titays would correlate to the decline in productive manufacturing? Let’s get the research team together.”

3

I’ll take a thousand body-GDP correlation studies over the (c)rank lunacy/social democratic apologetics of “happiness research”, personally.

4

At first glance I thought this might be a thread showing that Republicans have tiny richards, we already know they have tiny huevos … lol … sorry for intruding … noches

5

Perhaps I can take it as a reflection of the broad majority of this board, I thought this thread would have had more comments by now; but I had trouble standing up feeling like my sides were going to split when I was reading this paper and showing it to friends yesterday.

6

The implications are obvious; we increase GDP growth exponentially by subsidizing male enhancement surgeries.