Here is a chapter of this Yale academic’s book http://www.commoner.org.uk/10graeber.pdf
Has anyone else read this? I am reading through it because someone sent it to me to look at. He is a Marxist of sorts. It is claimed his “theory” of value is nothing like classical economists’. This might be true if we’re talking about classical economists who subscribed to the labor theory of value, like Marx. It’s largely a mishmash of political bias and polemics I think. Any thoughts?