So someone just sent me this message to my Youtube account inbox:
"The food distribution market in the U.S., when it WAS completely free market, was as bad as our present free market health care delivery system. As undeniable proof of that statement, check out what happened to ONE-FIFTH of the men who showed up for induction into the military during World War Two – they were rejected due to NUTRITION deficiencies. This at a time when the military was taking anyone who could hold a rifle. It was THAT reason – the lack of people able to fight a war – that caused governmental intervention into food distribution. The fact that people were badly fed had almost nothing to do with it.
Over the decades, as the depths of hunger and malnutrition in the U.S. became more clear, government’s role in the distribution of food has (praise be to God!) increased, meaning fewer and fewer people are left vulnerable to malnutrition."
It kind of caught me off-guard. How should I respond?