Hulsmann

[hayekianxyz]

@Byzantine

@Laughing Man

Who Rothbard?

Yes. I heard he was married as well.

To a woman.

Next thing you know he’ll be advocating locking the gays up.

Especially with comments such as this:

@Murray Rothbard

ML is he a he;… The ML was in his twenties twenty years ago, and is now in his fourties. That is neither as banal, or as benign as it sounds, because it means that the movement has not really grown in twenty years;… The ML is fairly bright, and fairly well steeped in libertarian theory. But he knows nothing and cares less about history, culture , the context of reality or world affairs. His only reading or cultural knowledge is science fiction,… The ML does not, unfortunately hate the state because he sees it as a unique social instrument of organized aggression against person and property. Instead, the ML is an adolescent rebel against everyone around him: first, against his parents, second against his family, third against his neighbours, and finally against society itself. He is especially opposed to institutions of social and cultural authority: in particular against the bourgeoisie from whom he stemmed, against bourgeois norms and convetnions, and against such institutions of social authority as churches. To the ML, the State is not a unique problem; it is only the most visible and odious of many hated bourgeois institions: hence the zest with which the ML sports the buttom, “Question Authority.”… And hence, too, the fanatical hostility of the ML toward Christianity. I used to think that this militant atheism was merely a function of Randianism out of which most modern libertarians emerged two decades ago. But atheism is not the key, for let someone in a libertarian gathering accounce that he or she is a witch or a worshipper of crystal-power or some other New Age hokum, and that person will be treated with great tolerance and respect. It only the Christians that are subject to abuse, and clearly the reason for treating them differently has nothing to do with atheism. But it has everything to do with rejection and spurning bourgeois American culture; and any kind of kooky cultural cause will be encouraged in order to tweak the noses of the hated bourgeois. … In point of fact, the original attraction of the ML to Randianism was part and parcel of his adolescent rebellin: what better way to rationalize and systematize rejections of one’s parents, fmily, and neighbors than to join a cult which denounces religions and which trumpets the absolute superiority of yourself and your cult leaders, as contrasted to the robotic “second-handers” who supposedly people the bourgeois world? A cult, furthermore, which calls upon you to spurn your parents, family and bourgeois associates, and to cultivate the alleged " or not, [MLs] are libertarian communists: anyone with property is automatically expected to share it with other members of the extended “family”.

He needs to be purged and his books burned. Don’t even get me started on those fasict pigs Hoppe and Mises.