Long, Rothbard, Mises, Hoppe, etc… all ground their ontological/scientific sociology with praxeology. Sometimes there is a misunderstanding over the fact that a link between the two is possible without ruining what the essential nature of what ontological/scientific sociology and praxeology entail. I haven’t read Long (and he’s not mentioned in those links), but I find no reason to think he is out of that loop. They are all knowledgeable about praxeology and I’ve never seen anything posted in the forum that would say differently. It’s usually participants of the forum, me included, that have yet to attain an accurate insight into any one of those philosophers/economists at any one or more point while being here that leads to misconceptions and thus misrepresentations.
side A: “No, that’s not what he is saying.”
side B: “Look I found this here.”
side A: “Yes. And that doesn’t change anything he is still not saying what you think.”
misrepresentations and misconceptions.
Welcome to the Forum![:)]
There are some in the forum, such as the OP of this thread, that have studied Long intensively so you will find others that would probably agree with your sentiments.