Jayjay,
Just need to clarify some points in your post.
Firstly Steve Keen and Hyman Minsky, being Post Keynesian are not paranoid about debt. Debt performs a useful function within the market. It is only when it is used for speculative and ‘unproductive’ means that they have cause for concern.
Secondly, I noticed your use of scare quotes on Steve calling the crisis. What exactly are you trying to imply?
Thirdly, on removing the flaws in the market.Maybe I can shed some light. Because Steve adheres to complexity theory (chaos theory) he sees the market as one aspect of a system evolving that is constantly evolving through time. It’s an identifiable process. A chaotic system can be made more stable by fixing some of the initial conditions. Now his solution is to fix some of the initial variables to limit how unstable the system can become.
I think, though I will admit I am not entirely sure and my knowledge is limited, that a similar claim can be made with what an ancaps are trying to do with the social system; fixing some of the initial conditions and then allowing the system to continue on from there. For example, establishing private property rights and a contract system. This is of course if assuming that ancap is a process theory and not an end-state theory.
Fourth. I think you will find most universities in Australia are similarly ‘socialistic’. Most of them promote sustainability, equality and other various ideas that tend to be associated with socialism. UWS is no no different in this regard. One point I’d like to make though is from what I’ve seen it is the only unversity in Sydney which offers a compulsory History of economic thought and political economy. it is a lot more pluralistic in what it allows to be taught. Students will read about Austrian economics, as well as other heterodox schools. I don’t think the same can be said about the other unis in sydney. I have a few friends enrolled in course in two of the other unis and their either have not heard of Austrian economics or can only vaugely mention some ideas associated with them.
fifth.I don’t know where you got the idea about he is thinks capitalists are evil. This reminds me other quotes I’ve read where people say he hates capitalism, he hates profit, he supports communism.
I assume by your mention of cavalier that you are referring to his February debtwatch 31 (in January of his archive). The quote can be understood as his criticism of banks lending out credit for speculative and unproductive means, which combined with endogenous money creation is a core idea in Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis. It’s hardly dogma.
Your post sounds like similar ones I read where Rothbard is characterised as supporting multi-national corporations, slavery etc or ancaps (I realise Rothbard is an ancap but these are claims i’ve read on ancap) apparently supporting pillaging of oceans and natural resources and pollution. They are just as baseless. The Unfortune thing is that it appears to be on all sides of politics.