Is BitCoin the currency of the future?

[filc]

@Peter Šurda

You are making a separate claim, rather than providing a counterargument to my argument.

I think it was established several pages ago that I had no particular argument directed at you. That your argument was inaplicable to the previuos discussion that occured over the past 20 pages.

In fact two different people on seperate occasions, not me, have gone out of their way to remind everyone the topic of the discussion. It certainly is not the case that I am mistaken as to what the OT was about.

Example1

Example2

@Peter

pretend to be interacting with others but actually just talking to yourself.

The last 25 pages speak otherwise. I have held dialogue’s with many others, before you even came. The fact that you think I have not is just further evidence that you actually did not read everything I posted. Instead you probably just lied and said you did. I haven’t even the slightest why your posting or what your badgering on about.

I have stated this several times over, unless your arguing that BTC’s are a widely accepted currency, a money, then we have no quarrel. How many more times shall I repeat it to you?

@Peter

Of course, purely hypothetically, it is possible that you do have a counterargument and I just don’t get it. That is why I am trying to get you to confront my arguments, which you refuse.

If anything I corrected you in the past over your mis-information or mis-interpretation of key Austrian insights. But I have never presented an argument to refute yours. As I have no earthly idea w hat your “argument” is.

The irony of accusing me of talking to myself is over the top here!

@Peter

Again, you guys are essentially talking to yourselves. You do not confront your opponents.

Yes, Micah, Moonshadow, and everyone else before you were were pigments of my imagination.

@Peter

It does deal with human action, but it does not reject empirical methods,

Neither does praxeology. A priorism and a posterori are not mutually exclusive. You place yourself into a false dichotomy to choose extreme degrees of each. They both work in tandem. Praxeology explains to us what we understand about the empirical world. It’s an intregal part to the devleopment of the regressiom theorem. It explains to us the signifigance of exchange ratio’s, the ultimate establishment of prices amongst a common medium and eventualy what is finally established as money. Praxeology and empirical methods are not mutually exclusive. They are necessarily intwined. The very concept of “Human Action” implies the objective observation of preference after action taken.

@Peter

normative assumptions that I have been pointing out since the beginning.

Your just confusing yourself here. I asked you before, what normative assumptions?

@Peter

I have expressed and repeated them several times.

Provide a link to your post where you explained the normative assumptions.

@Peter

Just another indication that your goal here is not a genuine discourse, but preaching dogmas.

The irony here is I have no direct quarrrel with you, yet you seem bent on creating one.

Hilarious. You must be getting frustrated at this point. Stop and think why? What are you frustrated at? What are you trying to prove to me? You don’t even know what my argument is and you’ve provided evidence that you haven’t read a single thing I’ve posted in the first 25 pages. So why do you invest so much energy in me specifically?

You must have missed all of these since you seem to believe I am talking to myself.

Here is my primary explanation of my argument.

My Argument

A

Here is a list of dialogue’s I have had with others.

A

B , C , D , E , F ,

Here are are some of Clayton’s posts I agree with.

A, B

But I suppose you think he was talking to himself to.

Here is a whole other topic I started which explores alternative digital currencies

A

So do you want me to waste my saturday re-referencing my posts for you?