Exactly. What F4M fails to realize, is that by not practicing what he preaches, we can only conclude that he does not believe what he is saying. Consider:
- I preach against the evils of aggression
- Agression is immoral, bad, evil, the cause of all suffering, etc.
- I beat my neigher without just cause (i.e. I aggress against him)
We can only conclude that I do not actually believe that aggression is immoral, bad, and evil. It is obviously the same with F4M:
- Civilization and Agriculture are by definition immoral, bad, evil, etc.
- Technology is a derivative of Civilization and Agriculture, therefore it is by definition immoral, bad, evil, etc.
- F4M uses technology to consume food products of Agriculture
- F4M uses technology to converse with other people (Civilization!!!)
- In other words, F4M uses immoral and evil means to consume immoral and evil food while using immoral and evil means to converse with other people, which is…wait for it…immoral and evil
We can only conclude that F4M does not believe a word of what he is saying, else he would stop doing all actions that he “considers” to be immoral and evil.