He is?
To what end? He’s way too effective at waking people up to reality, and certainly isn’t offering false solutions like someone like a Bill Still or Paul Grignon. If his purpose is to distract people with “solutions” that only help the elite maintain their position, he’s quite possibly the biggest failure in the history of civilization.
The man’s done more than any other in modern history to rally people to the cause of liberty and engage them to educate themselves…and as Walter Block has said, Paul’s done more for libertarianism than all of his critics, put together…
And your issue is you think he might be a double agent, and the fact that he’s older than ideal. I’m wondering how much you’ve actually thought about this.