I think Egon may in fact be associated with the Anglophile elite. He’s coming here to discredit Ron Paul, who champions the cause of liberty and non-interventionism at home or abroad. If RP is discredited, millions won’t flock to the cause of liberty. If this happens, the AE can now rule without suspicion.
The evidence does favour this tremendously, given Egon’s predeliction for English.
There’s no alternative to Ron Paul that I can see. Nobody has the consistent record of defending liberty.
There’s no point to continuing this discussion.
That Keanu Reeves macro never, ever gets old, lol.
“Anglophone Elite” has to be one of the more ridiculous conspiracy groups I’ve heard of yet. WATCH OUT THEY SPEAK ENGLISH.
Winner!!!
Well, I have no doubt that there is a NWO. However, it’s not what it appears to be. Watch this to see what I mean. The NWO is a delusion whose purpose is to keep the idealist fanatics busy feeling like they’re “building a better world” while the ruling Elite go about doing what they’ve always done: raping, pillaging and enslaving the masses.
There are NWO heels. These are CFR-affiliated (even if secretly affiliated) extremists who play “opposition” to the Establishment. For example, I suspect Rush Limbaugh was put on the payroll at some point and I don’t think the much-touted radio deregulation of the 1990’s that lead to the “alternative conservative media market” was an accident. It was supposed to provide a “pressure release” for the public so they could feel that things were being changed when, in reality, nothing was being changed.
Ron Paul is not a NWO heel because what he’s saying goes way, way beyond the allowable bounds of controlled dissent. I’ve mentioned in another thread that I suspect Ron Paul might have an angel guiding him, by which I mean a defector within the Establishment who is providing guidance to Ron Paul to help him push the right buttons and pull the right levers at the right time to navigate the political hurdles which are supposed to keep anyone who could actually challenge the system from ever getting to a position where they could do so. The key is to note that this would be a defection, not “the Elites” trying to manage a puppet heel.
Clayton -
Ron Paul = Good
Good = Bad
I get it, Egon. Continue…
Paul is a freemason right? This doesn’t mean that he is “in on” anything. Not all masons think the exact same thing, but since he’s a member they let him play ball. Notice how Cain was taken out and the others are either goons (Bachmann and Santorum), puppets (Gingrich, Romney, Huntsman), or patsies (Perry). Paul is not forwarding the agenda of any international bankers trying to take the monopoly of money making away from the Fed, its banks, and Treasury. He is also the only candidate who will not use the overwhelming police authority to quell dissent when the day of inevitablity comes. The laws are there, but will we have a leader who will use them or get rid of them?
Intersting, Clayton, mentioned a “defector” within the Establishment informing to Paul. That could be, but that means there is someone within the network of rouges in the bureaucracy is doing it. I feel like this would be gloves off, I mean way more than media smears (those are for low level threats of perception, not of critical information. If critical stuff, the criminal, stuff is getting out that would put the peopel involved on a whole different list.
I wonder if anyone else noticed his immediate demeanor change Ron Paul had in the days of the Iowa caucus? He seemed to be berating himself in the media while Rand was super optimistic. My thought was that someone had threatened him. Then, when Paul came in third he was happy, but Rand was not. Also, how oddly suspicious is it that Romney and Santorum both got 30,000 votes almost dead on? Did they accidentaly buy the same number of votes?
RP has certainly changed; he’s been a lot more fiery lately, like how he was during the '88 campaign.
*rolling eyes… the bureaucracy does exactly what the Power that Be want it to do. There are no “rogues” in the bureaucracy. At CIA, for example, there are a chosen few untouchables that Dwell On High and Get Shit Done and the rest are there to handle the cover ups.
That could be but, at this point, Ron Paul is not an actionable threat.
Clayton -
I have often wondered if Dr. Paul might be a “double agent” so to speak. Excuse me while I adjust my tinfoil hat…
If he is a “sleeper” he is a phenomenal one. The good Doctor has talked a consistent game for the last 40 years. That is significant in contrast to the political class in current control of our lives. Such principled consistency is hard to fake. I’m betting that he believes it all.
I am inclined to give him a chance to prove his capacity for betrayal. As for his age, he’s in better shape than I am most likely, both mentally and physically. Same goes for his peers in Congress. I don’t have a problem with age.
Now, do I think he can change the imperial state? No, but I’ll help him try and hope that he derails the runaway train to Hell. I’ll take my chances with the train wreck.
What other definition of “conviction” can there be than a person who lives and speaks one consistent message their entire life into their waning years??
I wonder if there’s a little more to Ron Paul than meets the eye but I don’t, for a second, doubt his sincerity.
Clayton -
I don’t believe in the blowback theory. I see Al Qaeda as a CIA front group; therefore, all “Al Qaeda” attacks are false flag operations, not the result of genuine grievances caused by interventionist USA policies.
And what’s so unreasonable about the term “Anglophone elite”? There are English-speaking people in this world and some are more powerful than all others. How about using some logic?
This is just too easy. I’m starting to wonder if you’re just a troll.
Just starting to wonder? I thought you would have called it earlier!
I like to give the benefit of the doubt. Some people are just legitimately not very smart.
So? That’s still blowback… it just happens to be intentionally-created blowback. Ron Paul doesn’t engage in conspiracy-theory regarding 9/11 which is impossible for a person in his public position, anyway - right or wrong.
And al-Qaeda is not a “CIA front group.” They were a group of mujahideen fighters who would have done what they did regardless of CIA’s support and training which was given to “stop the communist threat.” In terms of their involvement in 9/11, they were at most patsies and dupes. And don’t even get me started on bin Laden…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSqdepNXGbE
Clayton -
If he is, he’s doing terrible job.