This is kind of crazy:
-
If he is simply taking a “back to Menger” approach that’s fine and admirable, but to call Mises “not an Austrian”: whatever errors he may have commited, is borderline crankish, or just inteded to shock.
-
Yes, being overly concerned with who is or is not an Austrian is silly, so this is a silly thread - though I think this may be an extreme case of things. It is possible, this actually might be one of the few “line in the sands” where such a use of the term “Austrian” might be an important topic of “who is and who is not”. The only other time I could see this comming in handy is if someone said “Menger has nothing to do with AE”.
-
To call Böhm-Bawerk an Austrian and not Mises is even more odd. Supposedly his theory of Capital and Intrest Menger called “The greatest error in economics”. Not that I’ll get into this on this thread but: a case can, and probably should be made that von Weiser has just as legitmant, if not more so a claim to a “Megerian essence” of things than Bohm Bawerk. So why Bom and not Weis?
-
Yes, Jaitly and Keiser are not so hot with libertarians in this video, no need to point that out in this thread, it’s boring stuff to me.