Justice - too important to leave to government

How will you have an authority of justice? Because it wields force? How is that any different than might makes right, or slavery?

Practical by whose standard? This is just rubbish, based on your subjective evaluation of what is and is not possible.

Why mix metaphors? There is no “public”. For the love of it all, you think that coercion is legitimate!

Your whole argument consists of, “We need to institutionalize coercion, to stop coercion!”

But it has been answered.

That’s called LIFE! You’re seriously not putting forth the idea that if people aren’t perfectly good, they need a government, are you? Because governments are made OF PEOPLE, you know–the ones who aren’t perfectly good? Way to destroy you own idea.

You want to impress us here? Don’t use self-refuting arguments.

I think the problem with this thread has to do with semantics.

Austrians believe there would be law and order without the state. There may even be “governments” in a free society. But they would be consented to by all who are a part of them. There would be no government without consent. But I think it is more that government services would exist in a free society.

So…how is that you ‘respect’ the theories of the so called founding fathers ? To them and to libertarians in general rights exist before any ‘social contract’ is in place.