Kokesh plans loaded open carry rally in DC, where it's illegal

Maybe it’s irony.

Doubtful it’s intentional.

Ok.

To me, this argument symbolizes the libertarian movement: arguing over the pomp and frills of a theoretical revolution.

to me, all that says is that you do not truly know how many angels can dance on the head of a pin when the interest rate is negative!

open carry of a gun is not a threat of violence anymore than open carry of a cell phone.

Who knows what kind of microwave terrorism one might employ with a band of people using cell phones in public!??!

Look what can happen when you leav the cellar:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sraPLEQ70pw&feature=youtube_gdata_player

What’s that he’s doing, educating an unlikely audience about voluntaryism? Given the opportunity only because he’s planning a “bloodbath”.

=D

The CFR stooge throwing him softballs seems quite pleased to see this go down. Kokesh used the precise word I would have used… “choreographed”. Indeed.

Clayton -

Yeah, the CFR stooge (what does that mean?) also read a tweet that called Kokesh a provocateur. You do not appear to know what the CFR is.

Awwwww, how cute… our resident CFR stooge doesn’t even know what he is!

Indeed. Modus operandi #1: hide the truth in plain sight. Calling a thing precisely for what it is is often the surest way to prevent criticism on that grounds.

Clayton -

Old people get so upset at, I love it.

You should explain what CFR does. You know, for all of us that don’t know it.

*shrug

Clayton -

JJ did that earlier.

[quote]

Because there are no CFR members in the MSM.

And, no, they are not the top of the pyramid… but they’re a lot farther up the pyramid than a serf like me.

Clayton -

You’re evading a direct response. You’ve truly never read the things that they publish. Ope, but all that is is propaganda, right? You don’t want people to have actual information that the conspirators work with or it might not look as much like you want it to.

Right? Cause your non-fact checking hypothesizing is as accurate as the Encyclopedia Britannica. Right? Right, Clayton?