Libertarian view on the Joe Horn Case

Some may have heard about the Joe Horn case. Where a Texas Home owner shot two burglars broke into his neighbours house, after they had left that house and entered his property.

A Grand Jury did later clear Joe Horn.

What is your opinion on this - And what would be the Libertarian point of few.

The libertarian point of view?

They were trespassing and he shot them. They had broken into his neighbor’s house. What’s the problem?

Castle or not, these men violently aggressed a neighbors property and this man was preventing them from continuing their plunder. Then they decided to make their exit across this mans property. Besides, law enforcement regularly determines that property is worth more than shooting someone.

I love the line "“Nope. Don’t do that. Ain’t no property worth shooting somebody over, O.K.?”. I wonder if the police will let the hoods come into their station or one of their houses and steal or damage property because property ain’t worth shooting somebody over. Or will the state and police feel the same way if the hoods loot the tax collectors. Or hell, will the state and police feel the same way if someone decides to resist arrest for not paying their taxes. After all it is just property.

A practitioner of private law was harrassed by government officials.