I don’t think this is necessarily true. It just happens to be that the majority of people who discuss on online forums are male (at least, when it comes to general topics, as opposed to topics such as “feminist studies”).
First, I don’t know what the importance of this question is, and I’m not going to make a comment about it.
Second, I’ll take a stab.
From what I can tell, men are more likely to be on the extremes of any bell curve than women. The philosophy of libertarianism doesn’t seem to be something out of the ordinary, or commonplace, or not extreme.
This paper really helped in my understanding of some of the differences between men and women:
Why are there so few women in general active in the philosophical side of any radical or political movement? I think it’s partly acculturation and social influence, and partially nature.
I’ve been wanting to discuss this section of von Mises’ Socialism vs. Rothbard-Evers contract theory. I think it can round out a lot of the touchy subjects we get into when discussing voluntarily assumed positive obligations.
Well, the libertarian movement is in favour of non-oppression. Individuals tend to fight for ideologies they believe to be in their class interest. So, libertarians tend to be smarter, more affluent, male, heterosexual, white, Christian, healthy, productive, tax-paying (if they can’t avoid it), attractive, proud, and any other politically incorrect quality.
I’ve found that if you scratch away the superficial political cliches and with a little bit of intensive questioning most self-sufficient, industrious people are actually libertarians… they just don’t know it yet. [8-|]