Looking for a quote on Keynes General Theory

Hi,

I’m trying to find a quote that I’ve read more than once about Keynes General Theory (I’m 90% sure it was General Theory and 100% sure it was at least a book by Keynes).

It goes something along the lines of “This book is a terrible read, that is hard to follow, difficult to understand, and filled with inconsistencies and errors. In short it is a work of pure genius.”

I believe the quote is by someone still living, I thought possibly Robert Reich but couldn’t find the quote at all, let alone attributed to him.

Does anyone know this quote and/or who it’s by? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Ben

Paul Samuelson, about the General Theory.

Hazlitt quotes him the intro to his Failure of the New Economics [available for free here in pdf]:

It is a badly written book, poorly organized; any layman
who, beguiled by the author’s previous reputation, bought
the book was cheated of his 5 shillings. It is not well suited
for classroom use. It is arrogant, bad-tempered, polemical,
and not overly generous in its acknowledgments. It abounds
in mares’ nests and confusions. … In short, it is a work of
genius.3

The footnote says it’s from 3 The Development of Economic Thought, ed. by Henry William Spiegel
(New York: Wiley, 1952), p. 767.

Thanks Smiling Dave! That’s it!

Is the General Theory really that badly written, or do Austrians say that because they don’t like the content?

Is the General Theory really that badly written, or do Austrians say that because they don’t like the content?

It’s oftentimes very amibiguous, and I think that he sometimes contradicts himself, although I haven’t read the book very closely. I actually plan to before summer, but I plan to do a lot of things and they never get done lol.

yep, planning is so much easier than actually doing…

I have a a supercomputer running an equation that will plan all my actions for the next 70 years.

I actually kind of enjoyed it, and it wasn’t that bad. Not much in there I agreed with however. I do think Keynes may have had a point when he mentioned our “animal spirits.”

It was poorly written from what I recall.

The so-called “animal spirits” concept is the most elementary attempt at explaining an actor’s decision to engage in investment.

Keynes’s argument is a bit more complicated than “animal spirits”. See Garrison’s Time and Money.

The so-called “animal spirits” concept is the most elementary attempt at explaining an actor’s decision to engage in investment.

I know what the concept is. I find it somewhat convincing.