I hear many pro-government healthcare folks make the case that the people who already receive government healthcare LOVE their healthcare. But is love enough to justify the theft of wealth from some people to pay for the healthcare of others? In other words, is love enough to justify the violation of rights? I say no. Anyone else care to have their say?
Kinda like the people in Iraq who loved the food rations they were receiving from Saddam. Food sure is good. Beats going hungry. Not much of an argument for Saddam to be the one to provide it though.
The boilerplate “love” argument is an appeal to popularity in emotional wallpaper; take no heed of it. It’s either used as a distractionary tactic or non-sequitur.
The problem doesn’t end there, but also begins with a faulty premise based on pure ignorance of the terminology they use (ie: everyone has a right to health care!) Do most people possess a basic understanding what is a right? IMO: No. As they use it, rights is just another vacuous buzzword like profit used to make people boo or clap.