*** March 2012 low content thread ***

Stuxnet: Computer worm opens new era of warfare

Redshirting: Holding kids back from kindergarten

Media’s Belated “Acknowledgment” of Saudi 9/11 Story

Guess what’s next!

Limbaugh and Our Phony Contraception Debate

Attorney General Holder defends execution without charges

Don’t Invade Portugal

Charles Koch Makes a Good Point

Will Anyone Ever Collect That $100,000?

Limbaugh and the GOP: The media stars and politics

Why Buy the Cow?

Conclusion: Wealth reduces domestic violence.

http://www.dailypaul.com/219318/eat-this-gop

Cross-post form our comrades over at the FLL:

Anyone else notice the resemblance?

What is the meaning of the second symbol?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falange

@Whelyous: I’d like to see the wording on that UNICEF survey. I mean, I also believe that under certain circumstances, a husband is justified in hitting his wife… that is, only in self-defense against an assault. In particular, I am suspicious of the data-point that fully one-third of Indian women in the wealthiest quintile responded that they believe a husband is justified to hit his wife under certain circumstances. If you’ve ever met an Indian woman in the wealthiest quintile in India, you’ll understand my skepticism.

Clayton -

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/03/whats-really-making-us-fat/254087/

We have to keep in mind that the richest quintile in India is 250 million people. I found this: “even urban India alone has no middle class; everyone at over $10 a day is in the top 5% of the country.” Maybe, when picturing rich indian women, we have the richest ten million or so in mind, not the typical person in the richest quintile. Also, this tolerance of domestic violence might be a particular problem of Indian culture.

That being said, the point of that graph really wasn’t the particular number of women tolerant of domestic violence, it was that the percentages line up with income, both within countries and in comparison between countries. We could rephrase the question or ask something similar, and still get the same correlation. This shows that gender equality is really just a side-effect of wealth, i.e. free markets, not of “feminism”.

@Whelyous: I’d like to see the wording on that UNICEF survey. I mean, I also believe that under certain circumstances, a husband is justified in hitting his wife… that is, only in self-defense against an assault. In particular, I am suspicious of the data-point that fully one-third of Indian women in the wealthiest quintile responded that they believe a husband is justified to hit his wife under certain circumstances. If you’ve ever met an Indian woman in the wealthiest quintile in India, you’ll understand my skepticism.

Well, I sort of agree, but I wasn’t the one who brought it up :stuck_out_tongue:

This shows that gender equality is really just a side-effect of wealth, i.e. free markets, not of “feminism”.

Causation/correlation much? So many confounding variables…

haha Wheylous… I have no idea why I addressed that response to you instead of EmperorNero…

Suicides in Greece jump after bailout

Welcome to America in the year 2015.

You’re implying that there is a causation. Prove it to me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbqPW7RqfgA

Haha, that looks like Cross-Site Scripting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAqolw9zsJQ