A nationalist rallying point never fails to bring out people’s true colours. I see this incident is already being used as pretext to dehumanize an entire group of people. A couple of people I’m acquainted with have labeled the shooter as “another Muslim fanatic”. They try to justify their call to arms sentiment of indignation through special pleading, “they’ve dehumanized themselves!” It’s a wonder people churn out such rhetoric, when the historical consequences of the us vs them mentality are crystal clear.
How about this: we stay over here, they stay over there, and then things like adjustment disorder, inter-tribal conflict, and imperialist wars are reduced if not eliminated.
Sounds to me like a slow Tuesday for the Predator crowd in the Pashtun valleys.
At least all of those killed at Ft. Hood were either soldiers pure and clean, or had taken it upon themselves to work at a military installation.
As much as I feel for the families of the victims, and am saddened by the violence in general, I have to say that this strike was probably more legitimate in the context of the war than most of the strikes being carried out in Iraq and Afghanistan by both sides. It’s certainly a lot more legitimate than both the US’s use of air power or the truck bombs in marketplaces.
It is strange to see all this hulaboo around Ft. Hood but in earlier similar incidents there was barely a yawn. Where was all this coverage when the recruiting office in Little Rock got shot up etc?
What does this say about the Iraq war? Simply put that it is so horrible that men are willing to kill their peers and compatriots to resist it, substituting a lesser hell for a greater one.
Those who pursue power need an excuse to pursue it. They need an enemy to “protect” the people from. And of course, most people value their “security” over their freedom. Whenever the state tells the people that they need to be protected, history will be ignored.