Has anyone like Dr. Robert Murphy ever responded to claims such as MEB on Amazon reviews to Garrison’s Time and Money or Hazlitt’s Failure of the New Economics?
He writes to the effect that neither H. or G. understand the GT and its advanced models in its full glory as described in chapters 20 and 21. Thus, as far as they could be critiques of Keynes and the GT, they are incomplete, I suppose.
Thanks