But, if it does not solve the problem that I already mentioned, it is not an “objective system of ethics”, at least how I understand that term. How should you call it “objective” if it heeds to the fact that ultimate ends are neither correct nor incorrect, if it is not able to not say that, if my ultimate end is to kill you and your ultimate end is to raise a family, I am “wrong” and you are “right”? What makes it “objective”, exactly? By the way, do you agree with what I wrote in this post, this post, and this post?