I for one find your suggestion well-needed. And I put the philosophical aspect of Austrian Economics well above that of its addressing problems in practical economics from the Austrian perspective. I have been trying to get questions answered on: https://forum.freecapitalists.org/t/3-ideas-to-improve-sustain-democracy/840 but know that its discussions belong on more to the plain of arguments on the nature of man and even teleology/ontology. A couple of key questions I’d like to have addressed are: does a belief in free market as understood by libertarians and anarchists equally mean faith in optimal outcomes (or just that it’s the best system available toward such, but in a flawed universe)? and how is the concept of democracy - with its one person, one vote; and government by consent of the people - not most compatible with free market economics (given that any other devised rulership requires a yielding of some portion of each person’s autonomy and proportional influence in the process)? I’d like to see those two questions answered, but am frustrated that they’re not read by those interested in questions at that higher, philosophical level - that’s really the basis from which all the rest of economic assumptions flow.