The woman incurs no debt. If you believe she does, show it. No, repeating over and over and over and over and over that she created a state of dependency for the fetus does not show that she incurs a debt.
Ah yes, the time-honored misconception of what a personal attack is.
Says you. Again, in the spirit of scholarly discourse I stand ready to test your assertion that I hate sex with any one of your female relatives of sufficient attractiveness.
Byzantine:
It is not an arms-length transaction because the fetus is unable to bargain for more favorable terms and is in this state, again, solely due to the mother’s own conduct. If she doesn’t want a baby inside her, then she can have her tubes tied or not engage in baby-making activities.
Do you know how hard it is to get any physician to tie a woman’s tubes that has never had a child? Or is not married and under the age of 40? Even if she has children, and is not married and under 40 years old it is almost impossible to find someone to tie your tubes!
It seems you are trying to make a comparison that cannot be made. From the perspective of the child, you are asking whether the child would prefer no life to a life with disabilities. It is a comparison that cannot be made. None of us know what “no life” would be like. None of us have experienced “no life” so we cannot express a true preference for it.