I typically stay out of debates on the topics I have only given a cursory glance. I want to pose a question though. For those that deny global warming (not the economics of its consequences or the merits of eventual market solutions) would you deny that it is beyond are technological ability to coordinate science to warm our planet? Meaning, is not without our grasp of technology to warm this planet? If you concede to this under coordinated efforts, why then do you deny it is beyond are technological ability to warm our planet without coordination? Why can’t randomization in technology, consumption and production lead to such an end?
Define global warming denial.
I’m kind of confused about what you’re asking, but I definitely think that, supposing global warming is real, the best chance we have at stopping its effects is having our cars/etc. release algae instead of carbon dioxide so that it’ll eat the carbon dioxide below the atmosphere. If that’s the case, we’ll end up having the same “global cooling” problem and we’ll be forced to use gasoline again to warm up the planet. I still don’t get why people are so worried about it. If it’s real, we really cannot do anything to stop it except stop living, and it won’t affect us our future generations too much either.