Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act

www.nfb.org/nfb/NewsBot.asp

Ok, this is just ridiculous…we’re going to use millions (if not billions) of dollars for an insanely small minority of the country? Assuming that there are currently 3 million legally blind individuals in the United States (it was 1.3 million as of 1995), this is only 1% of the United States population…not only that, but some of those individuals can wear glasses to bring their vision up to a level where they’d easily be able to see traffic. In addition, a large portion who are legally blind are over the age of 65 (58%)…individuals that are likely to travel with a companion, stay at home the vast majority of the time, or be in nursing homes. Goodness knows how many people this will really benefit…and at a huge expense to those who will not. Let’s also not forget that the tires make noise, as well…I don’t claim to be one that has normal hearing, but I can easily hear road-noise of cars that are travelling at slower speeds…of course, you can use the argument “what if they’re deaf and blind”…which begs the question “what are they doing alone under those circumstances?” not to mention you’red just proving my point of how tiny a minority this is that will ‘benefit’.

Let’s also not forget that drivers themselves have a duty to keep an eye out for anything and anyone on the road…last I checked slowing down and using a horn was quite effective at alerting people to your presence.

Not only that, but if the study finds that cars are required to emit a certain level of noise…it’s quite pathetic that the government is now mandating a certain pollution/nuisance level…so typical.

We should ban hybrids the same way we should guns.

“The National Federation of the Blind appreciates the wise and decisive action taken today by Senators Kerry and Specter to preserve the right to safe and independent travel for the blind,”

May I suggest banning ice from the walkway.

Why stop there?

“I hereby declare the right of the blind to see”

“For much too long have the blind been abused and ignored, as sight becomes ever more helpful in our society it is our duty to ensure that the blind must be able to see. We will be investigating into various possibilities in the house. In fact we just spent 40 million on this really cool tech company that said they know exactly what to do”

Altho folks excellent time for our engineers to start up a firm trying to solve this problem in a non-retarded way

I might make it clear, though, that I’m in no way opposed to the blind, in general, just that I’m opposed to the State imposing something on me. It’s tragic that some people can see, and others cannot, and that some have “iffy” vision, or can only see so much…I’m not not belittling them for this, at all.

Just thought I’d clear that up.