No it is that simple. You are a traitor to your country.
So is every other neocon.
Uh huh. Someone is going to have to die, who’s it going to be Marko?
So then you are not a minarchist. Minarchists believe in less state, you do not. You only believe in less state where convenient. Only less when it does not serve your end, but more state where it does. Your no different then a modern liberal who wants to expand healtchare, but retract war. Instead you just want to expand war, and retract healtchare.
So if you in general just want to squelch wealth and natural resources(who knows why), but do it in the prettiest way possible, why do you support blowing stuff?
Living in A State Run World - MNR
The difference is.. bloom wouldn’t have a problem being a concentration camp director.
Apparently you prefer the American to die.
Wouldn’t it make more sense then for you to support an expansion of welfare over an expansion of war?
You’ve got issues. You didn’t want to discuss this at all. You then see the thread about trolls. What better opportunity to shit stir, aye?
lol…
CHawk, listen mate - why keep ignoring my questions? If you don’t like them, why’d you start the thread? You knew you’d get them.
Don’t be rude, answer them OP.
I do what I think is necessary. I will not be restrained by labels and rules if those rules are overly constrictive. I don’t care what label people give me, I care about getting done what I want to get done. That’s the first priority.
I support defense. That just often happens to involve blowing things up.
Okay, what would you eliminate: Social security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, welfare checks, public education, public infrastructure, subsidized student loans, FHA (federal housing authority), minimum wage laws.
So (a) why would you eliminate them, and (b) would you eliminate them if you thought they could somehow grant you access to political power?
I’ve just got a lot of questions coming at me. No, I don’t care about you guys trying to ban people you disagree with. I read the whole thing about having forum rules because someone got upset that ya know someone said something he didn’t like. This isn’t about that. This is about me venting things that have been on my mind. I wasn’t sure how you guys would take it. I mean I knew how you’d react, Conza, but I wasn’t sure how everyone else would react. Anyways, alright which question?
Soooo… this minarchy of yours would protect rights by violating them?
Everything except public education. Because it’s money that could be spent on the military or at least cutting taxes and giving it back to the people that earned the money. Let them decide how they want to spend it. But…what I didn’t try to hand back I’d direct toward defense. Nothing is going to grant me access to political power right now.
Even at the expense of everyone else. If only we were all as wise as you to know what was best for us. I’m glad I have you out there making decisions on my behalf.
Best defense is a strong offense eh Bloom? [:D]
As much as I can, I try to let other people make their own decisions. Anyways, I’m not wise, I just understand my priorities.
Sometimes.
There will be no minarchy, there will be a socialist government with a few people who aren’t as gung ho about taking everyone else’s money as others are. I’ll be one of those people. But yes, I would protect some rights by violating others. It’s a nasty business.
I see no reason into supporting Israel. Regardless if you’re Jewish and want to support Israel (why not move there?) that’s no reason to support defending them half-way around the world for a war that has nothing to do with us. I support Iran on whatever they do as long as they don’t aggress against other’s (the aggression seems to come from Israel and the USA than instead of Iran).
Besides whatever war that could come up (out of deceit), I have no interest in us giving any type of funding or aid to Israel. I don’t approve of what they do, and Zionism itself is a sorry excuse for Jewish advancement and empowerment. (Among other things involving the State of Israel…)
Do you agree with Ron Paul’s foreign policy?
I don’t like the topic, but I like posting in it.
But if you don’t like me doing it, you are free not to open any more.
Nah, that’s the front. You’re not going to change your mind, we both know that. You arrived a neo-conservative and you’re still a neo-conservative.
Your problem isn’t adhering to logic, or principles - it’s the fact that you don’t care about them. Your whole failure stems from an emotional & irrational cognitive dissonance.
There is no helping you, when you can’t even help yourself. This “discussion” is a waste of time for anyone who takes any of it, or anything you say seriously.
You’re an attention whore and this is just another prime example (there are countless others).
When the heat gets turned on, like it has many times (With LS & Knight) - you back peddle, do your little jig (“hey I’m no troll, I’ll read Hans Hoppe’s D:TGTF I swear!.)” Well how’s that going for ya? Would love to see your intelligent review of it… some thing that is based on more than laughable, “personal feelings”.
Scroll button, use it.
Alternatively: Ctrl + F
Why not allow individuals to decide for themselves if they want to fund a preemptive strike on Israel’s enemies? Or is that something only you can decide on their behalf?
EDIT: We should really have a Bloom’s most outrageous quotes engine for humor.
I suppose that makes you a person of nasty character and a proponent of having nasty acts done upon people, as long as they are not Jews.
That’s something I’d be less comfortable leaving to chance.