I’m writing an article on Friedrich Hayek, [the myth of] economic optimality, and “market fundamentalism”, in ‘response’ to George Soro’s column on the same subject. While I’m not addressing the methodological debate between Karl Popper and Hayek that Soros refers to, his reference piqued my interest. I have Popper’s three papers published in Economica (“The Poverty of Historicism” I, II, & III), but I’m wondering what would be the good counterpart in book format (similar to how while Hayek published “The Counter-Revolution of Science” in two articles in Economica, he later published a book by the same title).
There’s the open society and its enemies
Interesting, Lachmann addresses the methodology of Popper(at the 1:09 mark) and says they are methodologically compatible, and in a way alludes to it briefly at the beginning of the lecture as well: